Atlantic Canadians and internal trade – foreigners in their own country

Share

In the Beginning

“The proposal now before us [Confederation] is to throw down all barriers between the provinces—to make a citizen of one, citizen of the whole.”           ~ George Brown, 1865

If only current inter-provincial trade regulators were so perceptive.

Our founding fathers might roll over in their graves if they were to see the state of  inter-provincial trade today, laughable – or pitiful – to the extent that long haul truck drivers from certain provinces have to change tires before entering another.

Those legislators were vehemently opposed to inter-provincial trade barriers (IPTBs) and included their thinking in the 1867 Constitution.   Section 121 of the Constitution Act stated that “All Articles of the Growth, Produce, or Manufacture of any one of the Provinces shall, from and after the Union, be admitted free into each of the other Provinces.”

Legislation today
Report cover of One Canada, One National Economy - Modernizing Internal Trade in Canada

photo credit Industry Canada

The 1994 Agreement of Inter-Provincial Trade currently governs the movement of people, goods, services and investments within Canada.   It  is intended to reduce barriers to trade within specific economic sectors, but not much has been done to aid inter-provincial trade in 20 years.

Video explaining why removing the barriers to internal trade is important

For Atlantic Canadians doing business across Canada, many of the old hurdles still exist. The AIT does not address problems like the lack of recognition of other provinces’ professional credentials, food safety, provincial business registration requirements, and highly restrictive rules for selling alcoholic beverages inter-provincially. Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) president Dan Kelley says,

“Doing business with someone in Halifax should be at least as easy for a business in Burnaby as one in Budapest.”  

As Canada’s premiers met in Charlottetown last week, the CFIB urged them to follow the Canada-EU free trade agreement as a model for modernizing trade within Canada.

<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
P.E.I. Premier Robert Ghiz is flanked by Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil, left, and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard, right, at the closing news conference of the annual Council of the Federation meeting in Charlottetown on Friday. (ANDREW VAUGHN/CP)<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />

Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, PEI Premier Robert Ghiz, Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard.                                  
Photo credit: Andrew Vaughn/CP

There were modest signs of movement last week in Charlottetown, but a great deal of work needs to be done to implement an inter-provincial trade agreement that benefits residents of all provinces and territories.

Importantly, the premiers agreed to undertake a comprehensive review of AIT.

Federal Industry Minister James Moore has been campaigning across Canada and wants to see “a massive change to the AIT.”  He notes that federal governments collectively have negotiated more than 40 international trade agreements since ATI came into effect and says,

” It’s just patently ludicrous for us to continue and to not make sure that we are taking full advantage of all of Canada’s economic opportunities for Canadians.”

What now?

In 2010, Brian Lee Crowley, Robert Knox and John Robson wrote Citizen of One, Citizen of the Whole for the MacDonald-Laurier-Institute (think-tank) publication True North.

They cited three reasons why it is difficult to measure the cost of IPTBs: one, they are so numerous and varied that no one has managed to list them all; two, they have such complicated effects that it is impossible to measure costs with certainty; and three, the harm they do accumulates over time in ways that are even more difficult to measure.
Jordi Morgan, Vice-President Atlantic of CFIB says, “it makes sense that an investor from Nova Scotia should benefit from investing in a small business in PEI as much as they would from investing in their home province. Why should a small business owner in Sackville, NB be restricted from accessing capital investment from a relative who lives 10 minutes down the road in Amherst?”

2014-04-02-09-49-38-JORDI

Jordi Morgan, photo contributed

Morgan says the barriers go beyond “business” to impact workers directly. He says that “A CFIB report released last year highlighted barriers in the area of skilled trades.   Of all the trades certified in Atlantic Canada, there is not a single example of apprenticeship requirements being the same in all four provinces.”

It makes no sense for Canada to provide greater benefits to our trading partners than to companies, workers and consumers within our country.

-John Manley, President and CEO, Canadian Council of Chief Executives, June 17, 2014

Preview of your graph

percentage of income going to top 10% of earners per province/territory

But Canadians need to be realistic.  What if we’re not talking about beer, but pesticides, fracking, or chemical waste?  Should any province be forced to do what others are doing, if it hurts their bottom line?   There will always be exceptions. Finding a happy medium may prove to be a gargantuan task.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *