All posts by AmeliaThatcher

Overcrowding an issue in some Ottawa wards

Share

By Amy Thatcher

A large number of people in Canada’s capital are living in over-crowded homes deemed “unsuitable”, according to National Household Survey (NHS) data from 2011.

Over 20,000 homes are classified as being unsuitable in the City of Ottawa, meaning they don’t have enough bedrooms for the number of people and size of the space, according to NHS guidelines.

And certain wards—Alta Vista, River and Bay in particular—have more overcrowding than others. West Carleton and Osgoode wards have the lowest numbers of unsuitable homes.

Map of Ottawa wards by suitable housing
The Alta Vista, River and bay wards had the highest numbers of “unsuitable” housing, meaning they do not have enough bedrooms for the number of occupants.

Ottawaunsuitable1

(http://arcg.is/1OUacCX)

unsuitable chart

The definition of suitable housing used by the NHS is derived from part of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s (CMHC) definition, which takes into account three aspects: affordability, adequacy (physical condition), and suitability (overcrowding).

“The NHS definition in particular has to do with the element of overcrowding, where people are trying to stretch their housing dollars,” says Fran Klodawsky, a Carleton University professor specializing in affordable housing.

Suitability is further defined by CMHC’s National Occupancy Standard requirements, which specify that houses must have at least one bedroom per adult couple, per person over the age of 18, per same-sex pair of children under the age of 18, and per additional child.


“More crowding in the Alta Vista, River and Bay wards could be a function of more apartments with lower income families crowded in,” says Steve Pomeroy, an urban planning consultant in Ottawa. “It could be as simple as a kid sharing a room with mum, or with a sibling of the opposite sex.”

He also indicated that these wards increasingly house larger minority families which may have different cultural norms than those we have adopted, and they may not consider sharing rooms inappropriate.

“Oftentimes, multi-generational families live under the same roof,” he says. “Grandparents live with their children and their grandchildren, sometimes even aunts uncles and cousins.”

Alta Vista River and Bay wards also have a disproportionately higher number of social housing units, according to Pomeroy.

While regulations do exist to combat overcrowding in subsidized social housing in Ottawa, the City’s suitability guidelines are based on square feet per person—not on the number of rooms.

Trudy Sutton, executive director of Ottawa’s Housing Help says that housing is deemed suitable if it has 100 square feet of bedroom space per person.

“This doesn’t necessarily line up with the NHS guidelines governing suitability,” she says. “Suitability depends on your definition.”

So, housing that is classified as unsuitable in the NHS may pass the City’s regulations. This means the amount of unsuitable housing in Ottawa could be much lower than data suggests.

Klodawsky confronted this discrepancy in definitions, asking—who decides what’s deemed unsuitable?

“There are tradeoffs, having just boys versus boys and girls versus having three kids in a room doesn’t always matter,” says Klodawsky. “If it means the parents are not as far away from their work than if they were living in the boonies, then maybe it’s reasonable.”

While regulations do exist to prevent overcrowding, the issue is not enforced regularly by City of Ottawa bylaw. Klodawsky says housing enforcement is mostly around major physical repair rather than the number of people per residence.

She says this could be because crowding is not necessarily a safety issue. Sutton did say however, that overcrowding is something that can affect one’s health.

“If you’ve got a bunch of siblings and mom and dad in a very limited number of rooms, it can affect sleep and the general health of everyone.”

A CMHC overview of housing suitability in Canada, based on 2011 National Household Survey data:

Page 1 of CMHC-April-2015-Housing

Page 1 of CMHC-April-2015-Housing

Contributed to DocumentCloud by Amelia Thatcher of David McKie’s Research Methods • View page as text

 

A Royal violation: Which Royal Oak is the worst health offender?

Share

By Amy Thatcher

The Royal Oak pub at 188 Bank St. may be the chain’s most unsafe Ottawa location.

Restaurant inspection data from the City of Ottawa reveals that the Bank street location has had 98 health violations in the past five years, from 2009 to 2014. And the trend is increasing—in 2009 the restaurant had just two violations, compared with 54 offences in 2014.

totalviolations

Second place for most offences went to the Oak’s 329 March Rd. location in Kanata, with 76 violations from 2009 to 2014. Third place was the 180 Kent St. location with 52 offences. The location at 117 Centrepointe Dr. had the fewest number of logged offenses—just two in five years.

RoyalOakbyRestaurant
Number of violations for Royal Oak restaurants in Ottawa

“When you’re in somewhere every day, you don’t see the obvious,” says Jonathan Hatchell, CEO of the Royal Oak restaurants. “Having an independent eye is very good for a business.”

The Royal Oak has 12 restaurants across Ottawa, spanning from deep west in Kanata, to Barrhaven and eastern Orleans. Hatchell says his Royal Oak restaurants get inspected once or twice per month by Ottawa Public Health.

“Safety in the food service sector and avoiding health hazards is critical,” says Martha Healey, a food and life sciences lawyer in Ottawa.

She says the frequency of inspections is based on a risk assessment done by the city, so restaurants with higher traffic get inspected more often.

Hatchell says the higher number of violations at both the Bank and March Rd. locations is likely due to the age of the buildings that house those restaurants. He says the majority of violations in his restaurants come are filed as non-critical structural issues relating to the building rather than issues relating directly to food safety.

The City’s inspection data supported Hatchell’s claim, showing the most common violation for Royal Oak restaurants relates to having the floor, ceiling and walls in good repair. This offence accounted for a quarter of all violations.

“That one is very subjective,” says Hatchell. “It could be a ceiling tile that needs to be changed or it could be a cracked floor tile.”

The restaurants are inspected not only in their kitchens and food storing areas, but also in their dining areas and bathrooms. So some of the accounted violations may not be directly related to food safety.

Healey explains that during an inspection, violations can fall into two categories: critical and non-critical. Critical violations relate mainly to food handling practices that could lead to food borne illness. These violations can include things like inadequate refrigeration, inappropriate food temperatures, food storage issues and hand washing among others.

Those issues classified as non-critical don’t relate directly to food handling and may not affect food safety at all.

“It’s a fairly brutal environment that we work in, walls get banged, doors get slammed, these are the day to day challenges,” says Hatchell. “To be truthful, we’ll get people that will stick a knife in a cushion, or they’ll kick a bathroom wall…there’s heavy wear and tear on restaurants.”

The busiest locations—188 Bank St., March Rd. and Kent St.—line up with being the restaurants in the oldest buildings. Hatchell says this correlates to the high number of violations at these locations.

The Royal Oak pub group has recently invested half a million dollars into both 188 Bank St. and 329 March Rd. restaurants. Now, post-renovation, Hatchell expects the number of violations to decrease in 2015.

According to Healey, there are a range of orders that can be made under the Health Protection and Promotion Act in Ontario when health hazards are identified. If restaurateurs fail to comply, there are offences which could lead to fines as much as $25,000 for a corporation for each day the offence continued.

Page 51 of HealthProtectionandPromotionActOntario

Page 51 of HealthProtectionandPromotionActOntario

Contributed to DocumentCloud by Amelia Thatcher of David McKie’s Research Methods • View page as text

Hatchell says none of his restaurants have ever been fined or taken to court relating to health inspection offenses.

“We’ve been in business for 35 years in this city,” he says. “If you weren’t a responsible business operator with regards to food safety, you wouldn’t be in business that long.”

More cases may mean human trafficking is actually declining

Share

The number of human trafficking cases in Ottawa jumped from just 1 in 2010, to 26 in 2014, according to Statistics Canada data.

The national numbers mirror the capital’s near-exponential increase in human trafficking crimes: in 2010 Canada saw just 23 incidents. That number quintupled to nearly 140 cases nationally in 2014.

“I don’t think we’ll ever know the true numbers in terms of what the situation is, just because it’s such a clandestine crime to begin with,” says Zaneta Miranbigi, chair of the Ottawa Coalition to End Human Trafficking (OCEHT). “What’s being reported is a gross underestimation of the actual crime.”

So why have so many more cases sprung up across Canada in the past four years? Does this mean human trade is on the rise, or does it mean law enforcement is cracking down on this hidden crime?

 

Recognizing a problem

In 2012, the federal government introduced a national action plan to combat human trafficking. The extension of the plan is on the table for this upcoming election, with the Conservatives promising another 5 years and $20 million to combat the issue should they win.

In 2013, the Ottawa Police Service (OPS) began a pilot project for a Human Trafficking Unit. The project wraps up at the end of this month after a two-year trial period, and will submit its recommendations to the service.  Sgt. Jeff LeBlanc, an investigator with the unit, says his goal is to maintain or increase the size of the unit.

“Looking at our caseloads, this should be a permanent, dedicated unit,” says LeBlanc. “By April this year, we were already at 40 cases.”

LeBlanc says he expects to see even more cases by the end of 2015, making it the highest year on record for human trafficking crimes in Ottawa.

He also notes that the increases in reported crime are likely due to increased enforcement and a specifically dedicated team, rather than an increase in human trafficking itself.

“When there’s no unit or education of officers to deal with this stuff, and the public doesn’t know about it…then the problem isn’t being addressed,” he says.

 Breaking Barriers

Understanding the definition of human trafficking is one of the biggest barriers for combatting the crime. Simone Bell, an Ottawa victim turned advocate, was caught in human trafficking within the Ottawa region for nearly 3 years before she escaped.

She says at the time, she didn’t even know that she was being trafficked. It wasn’t until speaking with a social worker that she realized what had happened to her.

“When you don’t know that it’s happening to other people, and when you really don’t know how to put a name to what’s happening…how can you even come forward?” she says.

A second barrier is that most people are unaware that this crime even happens in Canada. In reality, about 90 per cent of human trafficking cases are domestic—not involving any foreign women.

“It’s a matter of us thinking ‘we’re a western country, a civilized country, this would never happen here’,” says Miranbigi. “But it’s been happening here, it’s just been a little more hidden.”

Miranbigi agrees with LeBlanc, saying she has not noticed any increase in human trafficking rates. She attributes climbing cases to increased awareness of the general public, front line workers such as doctors and outreach workers, as well as law enforcement.

“Now, warning signs that that would have been missed are not due to increased education and awareness,” she says.

Ottawa a hotspot for trafficking

With its picturesque parliament buildings and winding canals, Ottawa seems to be too perfect a place for human trafficking to exist. But, as a capital city and business centre, Ottawa is one of the main pipelines for the human trade in Canada, according to Miranbigi.

“This crime is more prevalent in Ottawa than anywhere else in the country,” she says. “The biggest hubs are in Kanata and Barrhaven where you think you’re in suburb heaven.”

Miranbigi works with Bell to advocate and spread word that this crime is alive and well in Canada. Like LeBlanc and Miranbigi, she believes increased efforts and awareness are to blame for the higher number of trafficking crimes.

“Human trafficking today…it’s like going back to the 50s looking at domestic abuse. People didn’t talk about it, it didn’t happen, it was something you dealt with in the home. Now we have programming for domestic abuse and women’s shelters and things to help combat that. I can only hope the same will happen with human trafficking,” she says.