Category Archives: Masters2017_2

The Lack of a Legacy for Indigenous Soldiers in the First World War

Share

Nearly 100 years ago the Canadian identity was forged in fire. It was at the Battle of Vimy Ridge that British North Americans came to identify themselves as Canadian for the first time, a sign of pride in what their soldiers had accomplished where other allied armies had failed. Among those who fought at Vimy, but who are often neglected by history, were Indigenous soldiers. One was Robert Edward Kippling, a Cree man of the Peguis Reserve in Manitoba.
Kippling died at Vimy Ridge in the service of a country that gave him little respect or rights. Indigenous People did not have Canadian citizenship at the time, something that they couldn’t gain without first giving up their status as Indians. Nor could they vote. Yet despite this, the Government of Canada estimates that over 4000 Indigenous People enlisted for the First World War.
According to Brian McInnes, a professor at Minnesota Duluth University and author of the recent book Sounding Thunder: The Stories of Francis Pegahmagabow, the Indigenous soldiers were motivated more by existing relationships with the Crown rather than with the Government of Canada. The motivation in enlisting lay in the fact that many Indigenous soldiers fought to protect a shared homeland. Yet despite their intentions, they still faced great prejudice. They needed to “transcend they Indian-ness to be accepted” McInnes explains.
Kippling had an advantage over many other Indigenous soldiers in that he spoke English, the language of the Canadian Expeditionary Force. He enlisted in Selkirk and was put in the 108th battalion, where he received his training and with which he was sent to England. The 108th was a catchall battalion; anyone from Manitoba was placed here. It was with the 78th Battalion, the Winnipeg Grenadiers, that Kippling lost his life on April 9 1917.

As part of the 12th Brigade, 4th Division, the 78th Battalion was to attack from the northern-most Canadian position, towards the best-defended section of the ridge. Here the Canadian barrage of artillery, which had preceded the infantry assault, did not destroy the German’s concrete tunnels and dugouts as it was supposed to. This resulted in fierce resistance. Such was the resistance that the Canadian soldiers were unable to follow the creeping barrage—a technique where the artillery barrage advances at a steady rate as a means of clearing the path for the infantry. The 78th was to follow another battalion, but the lead battalion had pushed hard into German resistance and had found themselves outflanked. In the confusion the 78th Battalion advanced through to the next objective, the German third line. The few men who reached it did not return and by nightfall of the first day only 200 men survived of the original 700-strong unit.
It is most likely here where Kippling died. In all of the confusion of the opening attack, the heavy snow, the thick mud, the artillery barrage and counter fire from the Germans, Kippling went missing. He was retroactively declared Killed In Action.
His wife, to whom he left everything, survived Kippling. A part of his pay book included a military will, which read “In the event of my death I give the whole of my property to my wife Mrs. Charlotte Kippling.” At only 23-years-old the Kipplings had no children.
Little else is known about Robert Edward Kippling. His name lives on through a handful of memorials scattered across Canada and at his grave in France. But his contribution, and the contributions of all Indigenous soldiers during the First World War to Canada, should not be forgotten. As Canada celebrates in 150th Anniversary the sacrifices of Indigenous People cannot go uncelebrated.

The Canada Science and Technology Museum reopens for its 50th birthay

Share

A fridge, a stove, marbled tiled floors–everything in this kitchen looks perfectly normal, except upon entrance, the senses just can’t seem to agree. Vertigo strikes.

Visitors will once again be able to experience spatial distortion in the Crazy Kitchen at the Canada Museum of Science and Technology as it reopens in November. The reopening coincides with the museum’s 50th anniversary.

Visitors inside the popular Crazy Kitchen exhibit. (CSTM)

The museum was temporarily closed for renovation in 2014 as the physical building had “outlived its usefulness,” said Christina Tessier, the Museum Director. However, Tessier said they’ve “turned what was certainly unhappy times in terms of the closure into an opportunity to revamp the museum,” with the aid of an $80.5 million grant. Prior to closing, the museum saw roughly 300,000 visitors annually.

Although the building is being reconstructed, the central tenet of the museum remains the same. The museum has “the vision of being a highly interactive space to inspire kids with science and technology and innovation,” said Tessier, “that hasn’t changed for us.”

Museum workers construct a globe for the Canadian Museum of Science and Technology’s opening in 1967. (CSTM)

The Canada Science and and Technology Museum was first built in 1967 as a centennial project. According to the 1951 Massey Commission, the science museum “would serve not only to record Canadian achievements in science and technology but as a valuable guide and as a reference for future developments.”

Documentation written by museum historian Sharon Babaian revealed that the museum had a hasty start. The museum’s first director, David Baird, only had ten months to transform an old bakery into the new museum. The museum had to be a “make-do operation”, as Baird did not have the time to represent all of Canada’s important scientific and technological contributions.

However, Baird succeeded in creating the first interactive museum in Canada. Museums at the time were largely built on research and collection, but the Canada Science and Technology Museum introduced an element of visitor interactivity that was later widely adopted. “The idea behind this museum was that it wouldn’t be like the old museums,” said Babaian, “they actually in a way copied what we were doing.”

The Canada Science and Technology Museum was also the first to popularize Canada Day. “In the sixties and seventies Canada day was not a big deal” said Babaian. For Canada Day, or Dominion Day as it was previously called, the museum would hold additional public demonstrations that included driving vehicles from the collection, operating historical machinery such as a printing press, woodworking, and a broom-making apparatus. “It was all hands on deck,” said Babaian.

 

At the initial opening in 1967 the museum featured exhibits on aviation, vehicular transportation, agriculture, weather, and space. The museum’s most popular locomotives display and Crazy Kitchen have been present since the museum’s start, and Tessier intends on keeping these for the museum’s reopening.

New galleries will include Artifact Alley, Creating and Using Knowledge, Children’s Gallery, Moving and Connecting, Technology in Our Lives, and Transforming Resources. Visitors can look forward to 7,400 m2 of new exhibition space, including 850 m2 dedicated to travelling exhibitions from around the world.

Tessier is most looking forward to the demonstration stage which will be at the heart of the new museum. “We’ll have fire tornadoes and small explosions, and all kinds of great stuff,” she said, “but it’s also a space where we can talk about the present and the future of science and technology and innovation in Canada.”

For the museum’s future, Tessier said she is “looking at building up all of our educational and public programming so that we can engage more and more students and youth.” Tessier is also looking to engage audiences from across Canada through traveling exhibitions, outreach programming, and developing mobile apps.

“The museum is a window to science and technology and innovation in Canada,” said Tessier, “I miss being able to walk out on the floor and watch families and kids interacting with the exhibitions and seeing those ‘Aha!’ moments on a kid’s face when they learn something new.”

*Photos courtesy of the Canada Science and Technology Museum Corporation. 

The documentation that I’ve used are photos acquired from museum historian Sharon Babaian. They illustrate what the museum looked like in its early days. I also used the Building a National Museum of Science and Technology file written by Babaian for information on the museum’s opening. The file can be found on the museum’s website. Pictures of the new museum were acquired from a press release from November. They give the reader a visualization of what to look forward to when the museum reopens.

50 Years Later: We can now call for help in the mountains

Share

Adventures today are different. The routes may be the same, but the gear has changed. Particularly when it comes to communication. What people now carry on the Great Divide Traverse, is a far-cry from the original expedition.

The original ski party in 1967. Don Gardner, Chic Scott, Charlie Locke and Neil Liske | Photo by Chic Scott

The 320-km route was first skied in 1967 from Jasper, Alberta to Lake Louise along the mountain tops. It follows the divide between Alberta and British Columbia. This May will mark the 50th Anniversary of its completion.

“It was one of the last traditional adventures in the Rockies,” said Chic Scott, 71, one of the original expedition members.

The next time the traverse was completed, 20 years later, gear was lighter and you could communicate via emergency beacons. The devices were invented in the early 1980’s. If you were injured, sick, or lost, you could click a button and someone would come.

“When we set off in 1967, we just told the warden service that if we aren’t out in five weeks. We’re somewhere between Jasper and Lake Louise,” said Scott.

They skied on glaciers no-one had before. Passing mountains no-one knew existed. They were alone. If they fell in a crevasse or got buried in an avalanche, they had to assist themselves.

Today, people follow GPS maps. They can send instant messages using SPOT, a satellite tracking device.

When Gerry Heacock, 31, skied the traverse in 2011, his SPOT was connected to his blog. From the comfort of an armchair, friends and family could follow his tracks, which updated four times a day.

Heacock’s dad met them along the way. He carried food, knowing from their messages they were running low.

He brought fresh fruit and Grand Marnier to help celebrate his son’s 26th birthday. The group’s meager supplies were replenished.

It was a huge leap in luxury compared to 1967 when the original party only rationed food for 17 days. And the trip was 23.

“Some days all I had for breakfast was half a peanut. I even tried hunting a squirrel with my ice ax, but I couldn’t bare to kill the little guy,” recalled Charlie Locke, 70, now the owner of the Lake Louise ski hill.

An endless sea of white and peaks. Crossing the Columbia Icefield in Jasper National Park | Photo by Chic Scott

The original ski party saw no-one from start to finish.

Scott says the traverse has become safer with communication devices.

Last year, a skier on the traverse fell 30 meters. The team activated an emergency beacon and Parks Canada arrived within a few hours. They helicoptered the injured skier to Calgary. Back in 1967, it would have taken days to get help, as someone would have had to ski to the highway.

Emergency beacons make it easier for rescuers by providing an exact location and sometimes the ability to communicate with those injured. They can determine what resources are needed, such as a spine board for a back injury, or even a rifle in the case of a bear attack.

Communication devices can put nervous family members at ease.

“I don’t know if my dad would have let me go on a trip without a SPOT,” laughed Heacock. The tracking device, with the pre-set “we’re ok” messages linked to topo-maps, put his dad at ease.

We can now know if our loved ones are safe, instead of just wonder.

In the last 50 years, the Great Divide Traverse has changed little. You still ski over the largest Icefields in the Rockies. Passing Windsor-blue ice blocks, thrashing through uncut forests, seeing the same views they saw in 1967. No roads have been built. No hotels. It’s still wild country.

Yet, a palm-sized device ensures a helping hand is never far away.

*Both photos were sent to me by Chic Scott. They are from the original expedition in 1967. They are helpful because they provide the reader with a visual of the first ski party and a view of what they saw along the way. They add colour to the piece.

25 years after Somalia, Canadians still have a distorted view of peace-keeping, experts say

The beating death of a Somali boy at the hands of Canadian troops led to sweeping changes in the Canadian Forces, but according to some experts Canadians perception of peace-keeping also needs to change.

Twenty-five years ago, the Brian Mulroney government committed Canada to the United Nations Operation in Somalia I. At the time, Somalia was embroiled in a civil war and the operation was meant to monitor the UN-brokered ceasefire and secure humanitarian relief for the citizens.

The now-defunct Canadian Airborne Regiment arrived in Somalia in December 1992, and within a few months was marred by suspicious deaths culminating in the beating to death of 16-year-old, Shidane Arone on March 4, 1993. Dubbed the Somalia affair, what followed was an attempted cover-up and an inquiry into the operations of the regiment.

The inquiry concluded that there was an organizational breakdown in the support and leadership of the Canadian Forces and the Department of National Defense. The Minister’s monitoring committee on change was created and implemented the recommendations of the inquiry which included 18 changes to the training and education.

“The main thing that came out of Somalia was the anti-intellectual nature of the armed forces,” said Dr. Sean Maloney, military historian and professor of history at the Royal Military College of Canada. “And over the past 25 years, that has paid off in spades.”

Maloney, who has written about Afghanistan says that he has witnessed the benefits of increased education in the way Canada conducts its operations today. He also says that peace-keeping has evolved so much, that the Canadian public needs an education of its current meaning.

“Canadians have a distorted view of what peace-keeping is,” said Maloney. “Peace-keeping [operations] are the operations we were engaged in during the cold war.”

While the UN refers to Somalia as a peace-keeping mission, Stuart Hendin, a UN consultant who delivers peace-keeping training, disagrees.

“There is a fundamental difference between peace-keeping and peace-making,” said Hendin. “We use the term peace-keeping, but in fact it’s the wrong acronym.”

According to Hendin, who also represented now-retired Brig.-Gen. Serge Labbe, one of the officers caught up in the Somalia affair, Somalia was originally envisioned to be a peace-enforcing mission, not a peace-keeping mission. There was virtually no peace to keep, so the main goal was to protect civilians which involved military forces.

Speaking to last year’s announcement by the Liberal government to commit funds and troops to UN peace-keeping missions, Maloney said it was “premature”.

“That obsolete view [of peace-keeping] does not apply to the 21st century in Mali. Those conditions don’t exist, so that’s putting a square peg into a round hole,” said Maloney. “You want to do a peace-keeping mission, well Mali is not a peace-keeping mission. Mali is a UN- led, UN- mandated mission that basically, under their terminology, would be support operations or stability operations.”

In fact, based on the UN fatalities statistics, the mission in Mali is considered the most dangerous current mission. Since the mission began in April 2013, there have been 114 fatalities.

Maloney added that the mission to Mali stalled once the government understood what peace-keeping operations look like today.

“They realized that the world has changed and the environment has changed and that terminology is obsolete,” said Maloney. “And you’ll note that we haven’t deployed anybody there, right?”

Though Canada committed up to 600 troops to UN peace-keeping missions last year, they have not been deployed.

Source documentation:

1. The Somalia Inquiry Report that was released on July 2, 1997. It was helpful because it gave a number of recommendations that included training and mission planning. It helped form the basis of my interviews.

2. Video from CBC digital archives: “Somalia debacle a high-level cover-up”. I chose to use the video instead of news clips because it provided more information.This video was helpful because it provided an overview of the inquiry findings and the reactions to the findings.

3. Interview with Stuart Hendin current UN Peacekeeping trainer and the lawyer who represented now-retired Brig.-Gen. Serge Labbe. The interview was helpful because Hendin was involved in the Somalia affair through his work representing now-retired Brig.-Gen. Serge Labbe, so he knew that operation and in his current capacity with the UN, he could speak about what peace-keeping operations mean today.

4. Interview with Dr. Sean Maloney, military historian and professor of history at the Royal Military College of Canada. This interview was helpful because even though Maloney was not involved in Somalia, through his experience and research into other operations, he was able to provide an understanding of the evolution of peace-keeping operations.

After 50 years of optimism, Leafs fans have a real reason for hope

Share

CBC archival footage documenting the events of the celebratory 1967 Stanley Cup parade held by the Toronto Maple Leafs (Source: YouTube).

He was a wide-eyed rookie on a team of aging veterans when the Toronto Maple Leafs last paraded down Bay Street amidst rows of horses, Stanley Cup in hand. Brian Conacher, now 75, says that the past five decades have been defined by false hope for generations of Leafs fans.

Dave Keon, Brian Conacher, and Ron Ellis played on the 1967 Toronto Maple Leafs Stanley Cup winning team – (Source: Wikimedia Commons).
Keon, Conacher and Ellis spoke to the atmosphere of parading down Bay St. in 1967. Here is Keon’s contact information. (Source: Whitepages).
A screen capture of the contact information from The Ron Ellis Team Canada Foundation’s website (Courtesy: Ron Ellis).

However, Conacher thinks that this year can be different for the Leafs, who entered this season tied with the St. Louis Blues for the longest-active Stanley Cup drought in National Hockey League history at 50 years.

“The Leafs as we see them today are the most hopeful we’ve seen in years,” Conacher said.

“You flip a coin and they have as good a chance of winning in the playoffs as anybody else. The key is to get there.”

To locate Conacher I used Canada411. I verified the address using Google Maps, which showed me an image of a retirement home in Toronto, to which I presumed Conacher might live (Source: Canada411).

The Leafs won their 13th Stanley Cup in 1967 in a six-game series against the Montreal Canadiens. It was the team’s fourth cup in six years, and their most recent to date – a distinction that Toronto fans are reminded of yearly.

David Shoalts has covered the Leafs for The Globe and Mail since 1990. Shoalts attributed decades of mediocrity to the trades made by the team  following their last championship.

“That cup win was actually the worst thing that could have happened to the team because it fooled the managers into thinking that they had a pretty good team,” Shoalts said. “What they actually had was a really old bunch of guys who were on their last gasp.”

Over the next few seasons Leafs head coach and general manager Punch Imlach parted ways with some of team’s best young players – Mike Walton, Pete Stemkowski, Frank Mahovlich and Jim Pappin.

Conacher believes that decades of Leafs management committed the same mistake made by Imlach in the years after 1967.

“They really decimated the organization. The Leafs went into the wilderness and got rid of a lot of good young players,” Conacher said. “Up until now, the Leafs have been notorious for devouring their young.”

Born and raised in Toronto, Conacher knows what winning a Stanley Cup would mean to Toronto – a city often used as the punchline of jokes made by fans of the Montreal Canadiens, who in comparison boast a league leading 24 Stanley Cups to their name.

The Leafs currently sit in eighth place in the Eastern Conference, clinging to the final playoff spot.

This is a picture Leafs fans have seen before. The team made the playoffs six times in both the 1990s and the first decade of the 2000s, but failed to make it to the Stanley Cup Finals once during either span.

“They’ve had spurts of respectability, but the psyche as a group of Leafs fans has never been healthier – just because the team is overachieving right now,” Shoalts said.

Similar to 1967, the Leafs’ young core is leading the way, only this time around, onlookers of the organization suggest that management won’t trade away the youthful foundation (Source: NHL.com).

That over-achievement is thanks  to the performance of the Leafs’ top rookies: Auston Matthews, Mitchell Marner and William Nylander. Together, they occupy three of the top four rankings in points by a rookie in the league.

Lance Hornby, a reporter who has covered the Leafs since 1992, senses optimism from the fan base, despite the team’s precarious position.

“They’re starting to see hope at the end of the tunnel,” Hornby said.

Entering Saturday night, the Leafs have 18 games left to secure a playoff spot. The Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook currently has the Leafs as 50-1 favourites to win the Stanley Cup, behind 17 other teams.

Although a Stanley Cup is unlikely this year, Conacher can imagine the impact of what a Stanley Cup win half a century in the making would mean to Toronto.

“It would be the fulfillment of a lot of hope and expectations over 50 years. I think the city would go crazy. It would make the Blue Jays or the Argonauts or the Raptors look like a pittance,” Conacher said.

“Maple Leaf Square would be full 50 times over.”

Dust in the Engines: Over 50 Years of Canadian Peacekeeping

Share

Dust in the Engines

 

Source Documentation:

The first source I used include the following photo of Camp Rafah, a British WWII base that was home to the majority of the peacekeepers involved in UNEF I. It helped to give a visual understanding of the environment of the first Canadian UN mission. I found it in an online archive curated and provided by one of my main sources Gord Jenkins. When listening to Gord speak it helped me to relate to the stories he shared as I knew what the base and surrounding area looked like.

The second source I used is the document found at the following link. It is a lengthy report about Canada and peacekeeping missions written in 1965 and recirculated by National Defence Headquarters in 1986. It includes a detailed description of the events leading up to, during, and following UNEF I which helped me to understand the context of the times as well as the politics surrounding Pearson’s suggestion for a peacekeeping force. I found it by arbitrarily typing words like “Pearson,” “Suez Crisis,” “peacekeeping,” and “UNEF” into the search engine and got lucky.

The maple leaf isn’t forever: Canada’s forgotten anthem

Share

On this year’s unseasonably warm Flag Day at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, the bells began to chime. The carillon at the Peace Tower – a 53-bell instrument – is played every weekday at noon and echoes through the neighborhood.

The recitals are “pieces from the Canadian repertoire, both current and past,” according to Dominion Carillonneur Andrea McCrady. Songs from “O Canada” to the less conventional “Wavin’ Flag” by K’naan filled the air along Wellington Street.

But on Flag Day, a different song rang out over the people that passed by. It’s a tune tied deeply to Canadian history, but only lives on now through occasional carillon performances and government events.

Alexander Muir’s song “The Maple Leaf Forever” was once Canada’s de facto national anthem, but has faded into obscurity in the 150 years since it was composed.

“I would be surprised if you found one person out of 100 who could hum the tune of ‘The Maple Leaf Forever’,” said Darrin Oehlerking, a music professor and Canadian music researcher at the University of Saskatchewan.

However, Oehlerking also called the song a “cultural institution” for Canada that should not be forgotten.

The popular story of the song’s creation came from Muir’s friend George Leslie. According to Leslie’s account in the 1914 book Landmarks of Toronto, Muir got the idea while they were out for a walk together. A Montreal society had posted an award for the best patriotic works that could be performed at their Halloween celebration, but Muir couldn’t decide what to write about.

Suddenly, a maple leaf fluttered onto Leslie’s sleeve, and he was struck by the image.

“There Muir! There’s your text! The maple leaf; the Emblem of Canada!” Leslie said in his story. “Build your poem on that!”

The song was a hit and experienced widespread success. “The Maple Leaf Forever” became popular amongst Canadians and was often referred to as Canada’s national anthem.

Cover page from one of the original 1,000 printed copies of Alexander Muir’s “The Maple Leaf Forever” (Toronto Public Library/Wikimedia Commons)

But the song had its critics. The Francophone population took issue with it because it celebrated British military victories in its verses. And once the originally French anthem “O Canada” was written and given English lyrics in 1906, “The Maple Leaf Forever” began to fall out of favor

Attempts were made in 1964 and 1997 to produce new and more inclusive lyrics for Muir’s song. But at that point in Canada’s history, “O Canada” was considered the national anthem while “The Maple Leaf Forever” had lost its lofty status.

The song hasn’t completely vanished from Canadian culture. Besides the Peace Tower carillon, the military of Canada has embraced the song as a more current national symbol.

The mandate of the Ceremonial Guard of Canada posted online includes participating and performing in significant Canadian ceremonies. Dominion Carillonneur McCrady said in an email that the Ceremonial Guard plays “The Maple Leaf Forever” regularly at summer performances.

And the song is still played by youth bands in Canada’s Cadet Program. Laurie McAulay, a Navy League lieutenant, has her cadet band play the song every night as a long-standing tradition.

“If the military hadn’t adopted it, I’m not sure if it would be as prevalent as it is,” McAulay said.

It’s certainly not as celebrated as it once was. The Toronto Evening Telegram printed an editorial after Muir’s death in 1906. It stated that “Canada will go on singing the song of her life, and remembering the man who wrote it.”

Now, Canadians will have to be content with hearing “The Maple Leaf Forever” played by military marching bands or on the carillon at Parliament Hill.

“I think it’s important that our government agencies are keeping it alive,” Oehlerking said. “I think that’s kind of all we can hope for.”

 

To see an outline of original documentation, click here.